Search:

Homogenization and Bead Tube Methods for RNA Work

One of the most efficient ways to extract nucleic acids from a sample is by smashing it against a hard surface repeatedly under high speed until cell walls and membranes crush from the pressure and release their internal contents. In other words: bead beating.

Bead beating is a great way to do what enzymes take hours to accomplish and sometimes never fully succeed in, which is cell lysis to release DNA or RNA for isolation. While enzymes can be successful for DNA isolation from a limited number of sample types, results are achieved a lot faster if you break down the matrix first. And RNA cannot be isolated in a timely fashion without the use of some kind of mechanical maceration.

The questions inevitably arise though, how hard do I need to beat to lyse my sample and how do I know what bead type to use?  The answers depend on a great number of variables, so to avoid beating your head against the wall to sort through them all, I have written this two-part blog series offering advice on the methods that we have used at MO BIO and found to work best for us.

This first article will focus on guidelines for RNA from tissues and plants.  There is so much to discuss about soil and microbes, so we’ll keep that for the second blog article, which will include data from our own research.

The Old Way to Isolate RNA- Liquid Nitrogen

RNA from tissues always requires serious pulverization. In the past, the most common method was using liquid nitrogen to freeze the sample and a mortar and pestle to grind the tissue to a powder. Although this approach works well, it is not complete. Once the sample is powdered and resuspended in a chaotropic lysis buffer, the genomic DNA is still high molecular weight and will add viscosity to the sample that can clog spin filters. To overcome this, the next step is to shear the genomic DNA with a needle and syringe which improves the efficiency of removing the genomic DNA from the column.

Drawbacks of Liquid Nitrogen Processing and Rotor Stator Homogenizers

Now, however, it’s the year 2010 and liquid nitrogen/ mortar and pestles are not the preferred method. Using these outdated methods, you need to either clean tools between samples, or you need to have a lot of them on hand and ready for use. The same is true for hand held rotor-stator homogenizers. This method is excellent for breaking a tissue down quickly and thoroughly so that the RNA is isolated with minimal degradation. However, the probe also needs to be cleaned between samples and there is always risk of cross-contamination. If you can use disposable probes on your rotor-stator, it is a better way to go. The drawback, however, is that you still can only process one sample at a time.

High Velocity Bead Beating- More Samples, No Cross-Contamination

This is where the high powered bead beaters come in and supersede the abilities of one-at-a-time methods. At MO BIO, we’ve developed a new instrument called a PowerLyzer™ bench top homogenizer. After working with and testing many models, we custom designed a machine with features that had everything we wanted for our own use, knowing that everyone else using bead beaters would desire the same changes. Basically, it’s a lot quieter and doesn’t vibrate your entire bench top.  And, the homogenization time needed for best results is also shortened (resulting in less heat and damage to the nucleic acids) because the horizontal positioning of the bead tube, (similar to the vortex adapter), is more efficient at grinding.   Less time means better RNA integrity.

What Bead Tubes do I Use?

For RNA from plant and animal tissues, we use the 2.8 mm ceramic bead tubes for two reasons. First, the 2.38 mm bead size is perfect for a 10-20 mg piece of animal tissue or 50 mg of plant tissue. We tested the 1.4 mm beads for tissues and the small size does not give as good a result with short homogenization times.  The longer time needed to liquify the sample increase degradation of RNA.

Using a single bead type (vs. a bead mix) allows for better consistency and homogeneity from prep to prep, since the larger more effective beads have complete access to the tissue and are not blocked by smaller less effective beads. The second reason for using the 2.8 mm ceramic bead tubes is because they are pre-loaded in a “Tough Tube” which is a specially made plastic bead tube that can withstand high force without breaking.

What is the Best Speed and Number of Cycles for Homogenization

This will vary based on the instrument used.  For animal tissues, we tested a wide range of speeds from 3500 to 5000 RPM, and while they all worked, the optimal RNA recovery was observed using 3500 RPM for 2 x 45 seconds using a 30 second rest between cycles.  This speed is about equivalent to a setting of 5.5 on the FastPrep. However, unlike the FastPrep, the PowerLyzer allows you to program any number of cycles and rest  time in between cycles, so you can save the protocol and program others and keep them handy for next time.

For Plant RNA, we found the optimal setting to be 4200 RPM for 2 x 45 second cycles with a 30 second rest in between cycles.  When 3500, 4200, and 5000 RPM were compared, 4200 gave the highest yield RNA from a variety of samples that included leaf, stem, roots, and seeds.

Summary

High powered bead beaters have many advantages over methods that process only one sample at a time. But for many people, this means re-optimizing current protocols. Fortunately, we’ve done a lot of the optimization already so you can get up and running right at the start. And RNA yields and integrity are going to be better when you can homogenize everything quickly and at once, and not have long lag times with your samples on ice while you move through all your preps.

If you are interested in ready-to-use kits for the PowerLyzer™ or other high powered bead beaters that are complete with the validated and optimal bead tube, you can find more information at these links.

For RNA from tissues go to the PowerLyzer UltraClean Tissue & Cells RNA Isolation Kit page and for RNA from plants, go to the PowerLyzer UltraClean Plant RNA Isolation Kit page. 

The PowerPlant DNA Isolation Kit is ready-to-use on high powered bead beaters, with tough tubes containing 2.38 mm stainless steel beads.

For DNA from soil and microbes, we will discuss this in an upcoming article and will present to you some very interesting data!

~Suzanne

11 Responses to “Homogenization and Bead Tube Methods for RNA Work”

  1. Bcrespo says:

    Hi Suzanne,

    Very interesting post Suzanne!!

    I have a question:

    Did you try sonication for RNA isolation? I think that it will be work fine, or maybe strong sonication could break the RNA?

    Bcrespo

    • Suzanne Kennedy says:

      Hi Bcrespo,
      Thank you!
      I haven’t tried sonication for RNA work but it might be possible to use this method to shear the genomic DNA after using a mortar and pestle. The RNA is small and won’t break easily. If the sonication gets hot, it will harm the RNA. Sonication can not be used be itself to lyse tissues for RNA work. It might be possible for some bacterial cells maybe or cultured cells. The old fashioned method is to use a needle and syringe for cells in a high guanidine and BME buffer so maybe you could use sonication for that.
      In protein work, sonication is sometimes used to help break down genomic DNA to reduce viscosity. I think it would be useful for that part of a prep but not for the initial break down of complex tissues. But then you still have the issue of one sample at a time and cleaning the probe between samples.
      Best,
      Suzanne

  2. Marcia says:

    Hi Suzanne,

    First, I liked your post very much, because it solved a lot of doubts.
    Second, I’d like to known if I could use a vortex instead of the PowerLyzer, because I don’t have in the laboratory a homogenizer for the beads tube. In this case, what would be the time required for the homogenization of the sample at the vortex?

    Thanks,

    Marcia Christina

    • Suzanne Kennedy says:

      Hi Marcia,
      Thanks very much for your comment! When it comes to RNA, the options are limited. If you are working with bacteria or fungus, you can use the vortex for lysis. This is what we do in our lab.
      If you have animal or plant tissue, you have to first break the matrix of connective proteins holding the tissue together and then break the cells. So a lot of force is needed. What kind of samples are you working with?
      You could use the mortar and pestle with liquid nitrogen to first break down the tissue to a powder and then resuspend the powered sample in lysis buffer and add to a bead tube to finish the cell lysis and shear genomic DNA on a vortex. This should work.

      Let me know about the samples you work with and I can provide more advice.

      Best,
      Suzanne

  3. Marcia says:

    Hi Suzanne,

    I’m working with plant tissue and I’m trying to extract RNA. In fact, I use the mortar and pestle with liquid nitrogen, I resuspend the sample in lysis buffer into the bead tube and shake with a vortex. But, when I did the electrophoresis looks like there is a RNA degradation. I macerated a lot until obtention of a very fine powder. Do you think this prolonged maceration followed by vortex could cause the RNA degradation, because the protocol that I used says that the sample must be finely minced instead of macerated.

    Thanks very much for the help. It’s the first time I try to use the beads tube method.

    • Suzanne Kennedy says:

      Hi Marcia,
      I think probably 10 minutes is too much after the same is already macerated, if you vortexed that long. What type of beads did you use for the vortex step- what size beads?

      You can try adding some beta-mercaptoethanol into the lysis buffer to protect from RNases. Use 10 ul per ml of lysis buffer.
      Have you tried grinding in liquid nitrogen, resuspend in lysis buffer, and then go right into the prep? If the sample is not viscous then it may be just fine. The genomic DNA causes a lot of viscosity that can make handling tough but maybe your sample is already broken down enough.
      If there is viscosity after adding lysis buffer, try running it through a 1 cc syringe with a 25 guage needle to break it down.

      Do you bake your mortar and pestle to make it RNase-free?

      Best,
      Suzanne

  4. Marcia says:

    Suzanne,

    I’m using ultra-high density beads (2.0 mm)and spin columns. All the materials that I use are RNase-free. I’m working with samples of Theobroma cacao (leaves) and, sometimes, it’s difficult to pass the supernatant through column because the samples are very, very viscous.

    Thanks for your attention.

  5. rflp says:

    your web site is great.I liked it, I bookmarked it and will examine detailed pages later,

  6. pepe says:

    how long can homogenized (pulverized/powdered) plant tissues be stored at -80 degrees celcius prior to RNA extraction? will the integrity of the RNA be preserved after prolonged storage at the said temperature? im asking because i ground some samples and stored them at -80 for a year. now i wanna extract RNA from these samples

    • Suzanne Kennedy says:

      Hi Pepe,
      Typically -80C storage will keep everything in stasis so there will be no RNase activity. Purified RNA can be kept at -80C for years. Plant tissue, however, may not be as stable.
      I would definitely give it a try. Adding beta mecraptoethanol to the lysis buffer will help kill RNases when you resuspend the powder. Proteinase K is a potent RNase inhibitor too.

      Best,
      Suzanne

Leave a Reply